GB/T 5752-2002
AbolishedConveyor belts--Marking
输送带标志
📋 Scope / 适用范围 ai_extracted
This standard specifies the marking content, marking dimensions, and marking positions of conveyor belts. This standard is applicable to all types of conveyor belts.
本标准规定了输送带的标志内容、标志尺寸及标志位且。 本标准适用于各种输送带。
📝 Foreword / 前言 ai_extracted
This standard is equivalent to the international standard ISO 433:1991 (Conveyor belts — Marking) and serves as a revision of the national standard GB/T 5752-1992 (Conveyor belts — Marking). The main differences between this standard and ISO 433:1991 are as follows: — This standard supplements the letter codes for belt carcass materials based on the final draft international standard ISO/FDIS 14890:1999 (Conveyor belts — Specification for rubber- or plastics-covered conveyor belts of textile construction for general use). The main differences between this standard and GB/T 5752-1992 are as follows: — This standard cancels the letter codes for basic belt properties such as U, Q, Y, T, C, M, and A, which were present in the original standard but not in ISO 433. — This standard adopts the letter codes for belt carcass materials as specified in ISO/FDIS 14890, whereas the letter codes in the original standard were self-defined. — The original standard specified that the longitudinal distance between two markings should be less than 25 m. This standard equivalently adopts ISO 433, specifying that the longitudinal distance between two markings should be less than 15 m. Upon implementation of this standard, it replaces GB/T 5752-1992. This standard is proposed by the State Petroleum and Chemical Industry Bureau. This standard is under the jurisdiction of the Chemical Industry Rubber Belt Standardization Technical Committee. This standard is drafted by Tongxiang Shuangjian Group Co., Ltd. The main drafters of this standard are: Shen Gengliang, Shen Weiming, Han Deshen, and Li Jian. GB/T 5752-2002 ISO Foreword The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75% of the member bodies casting a vote. International Standard ISO 433 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 41, Pulleys and belts (including V-belts). This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 433:1982), of which it constitutes a technical revision. National Standard of the People's Republic of China GB/T 5752-2002 Conveyor belts — Marking Replaces GB/T 5752-1992
本标准等效采用国际标准ISO 433:1991(物送带标志》,是国家标准GB/T 5752-1992(轴送带标 志》的修订版。 本标准与ISO 433;1991的主要差异在于: — 本标准根据国际标准最终草案ISO/FDIS 14890:1999(艳送带 具有橡胶或塑料班盖层的普 通用途织物芯输送带》,补充了带芯材质字母代号。 本标准与GB/T 5752-1992的主要差异在于: — 本标准取消原标准中有而ISO 433中没有的U,Q,Y,T,C,M,A等带的基本性能字母代号。 — 本标准按ISO/FDIS 14890规定带芯材质的字母代号,原标准字母代号是自定义的。 — 原标准规定两标志纵向距离应小于25 m,本标准等效采用ISO 433规定两标志纵向距离应小 于15 m, 本标准自实施之日起,代替GB/T 5752-1992, 本标准由国家石油和化学工业局提出。 本标准由化学工业胶带标准化技术归口单位归口。 本标准由桐乡市双箭集团有限责任公司负贵起草. 本标准主要起草人:沈耿亮、沈伟明、韩德深、李健。 GB/T 5752-2002 ISO前言 国际标准化组织(ISO)是由各国标准化团体(ISO成员团体)组成的世界性的联合会,制定国际标 准的工作是通过ISO技术委员会进行的。每个成员对已成立技术委员会的专业感兴趣,均有权参加该 委员会,政府的或非政府的国际组织经过与ISO联系,也可参加这项工作。IS()和国际电工组织( IEC) 在所有的电工技术标准化方面紧密合作。 经技术委员会正式通过的国际标准草案分发给成员团体投票.发布一项国际标准至少需要75%参 加投票的成员团体表决通过。 国际标准ISO 433是由ISO/TC 41技术委员会〔带轮与带(包括V带)〕制定的。 本标准的第二版对第一版进行了技术修订,撤消并代替第一版(ISO 433:1982). 中华人民共和国国家标准 GB/T 5752-2002 输 送 带 标 志 代替GB/T 5752-1992 Conveyor belts-Marking
📚 References & Relations / 引用与关联
🔗 Related Standards / 同类标准
Content extracted by AI. Not officially verified.